Value-Stock-Plus

Informed Investing!

Investing is most intelligent when it is most businesslike - Benjamin Graham (1894-1976)

____________________________________________________________________

Value-Stock-Plus stands at No. 50 in the list of Top 100 Finance Blogs  by ValueWiki

Recognised by The Economic Times as one of the most popular financial blog

Updated! Compilation on Warren Buffett, Rakesh Jhunjhunwala & Charlie Munger
____________________________________________________________________

Saturday, September 29, 2007

US bull market coming to an end: Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

Source: Moneycontrol.com

Rakesh Jhunjhunwala, Investor and Trader said that the US housing market is unlikely to bottom in mid-term. He added that US economic growth was unsustainable.

According to Jhunjhunwala the bull market in the US had signs of excesses. He said that he believes that the US bull market is coming to an end. Jhunjhunwala forsees a big slowdown for techs if the US markets slow down.

He added that interest rates and commodity prices will also come down.

Excerpts from Rakesh Jhunjhunwala's speech at Capital Markets Seminar:

It is difficult to believe that the largest holder of the US treasury bonds is China. To me, I think it is geo-politically very sensitive issue and if I were to be the President of America I would redeem them the next day. They have forgotten where Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai led (Indians) to.

Having said that, the US economy was the engine of economic growth worldwide. It was an unsustainable methodology of growth, where you borrow, borrow,borrow and consume, consume, consume. Also we had a 25-year bull market in America and all bull markets, regardless of regulators, always produce excesses. Excesses are not products of loose regulations but more products of bull markets because then markets make people lose their sense and they become absolutely greedy.

I personally believe that the US housing market is not going to bottom in the next 36 months; because you built 21 million houses in 2 years as against 16 million every year. So you build one million extra and at least out of those 16 million normal ones, 40% of the houses in the last two years have been sold to subprime and allied alternatives.

In Miami, you have a building boom amongst the housing bust. So I think the world is underestimating the consequences of this subprime or the meltdown of the US housing. There was a vicious cycle in America where you gave money to people on credit to people who could not afford USD 50,000 - you gave them half million dollars; not based on their ability to pay, but on the value of their capital assets. They primarily drove the buying of houses in the last 24 months.

On interest rates:

It is not the question of interest rates. No one in his right sense now is going to give loans to sub-prime mortgages again. The resets are just starting.

So I foresee a few things.

One, the problem in the housing market problem is going to get worse because there will be a lot of foreclosures. Two, there is lot of housing under construction which cannot be stopped immediately. And third, people say there is full employment in America. But housing is 70% of America’s GDP and that itself would lead to a slowdown in America.

This slowdown in the housing industry is going to lead to a slowdown in the US economy. This again, would mean lower wages and lower employment, which could result in greater housing loan repayments defaults.

I read an economist saying that Europe has had faster increases in housing prices than America. There is a very large subprime market even in Britain. So I think this will continue to transfer itself even to Europe.

I believe there have been great excesses in the US bull market. That bull market, in my opinion, is coming to an end and the real excesses will be exposed only after the bull market is over.

Though at the moment we are all very happy and feeling that this is something like long-term capital management or the Russian debt crisis, where the Fed reduces interest rates and all problems go away. I do not believe that because credit is not only available on cost; it is also a question of risk appetite to borrow and risk appetite to lend.

So I think that credit is no longer going to be available in America or if it is, it is going to be available in a measured manner. There is going to be a slowdown in America.

There are various opinions that if US interest rates comes down money will flow into emerging markets. Let us put the impact in two parts – one, how they will affect economic activity and how they will affect asset prices.

On India:

As far as India is concerned, I personally foresee a big slowdown for the software industry. I do not think that if America slows down; more work will come to us. I think if America slows down, more work could come 36 months later. I think 25%-30% IT budgets are discretionary and there will be big cuts in IT budgets.

As far as other Indian exports are concerned, I do not think they are going to be affected very substantially. As far as commodity prices go, I think they will come down. Interest rates also will be down, which is good for India.

US is a very dynamic economy; it has great self-correcting measures. This recession in America depends on factors like whether it is going to be orderly, or create a lot of disequilibrium etc. If it is an orderly one, I think Indian markets will be not be affected to a very large extent. But if it is a huge disequilibrium, then things are going to be quite unpredictable.

Labels: Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

Posted by toughiee at 12:12 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Just don't ignore subprime

by Parag Parikh, Narayan Ramachandran and Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

Source: ET

Even as fears of the US recession cast a cloud over Indian skies, stock markets across the world are waiting to see how adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) repricing would pan out in the US towards the end of this month. The key question in investors’ mind is whether a resetting of interest rates would trigger another bout of subprime contagion and volatility in world markets?

Though most experts in the Indian market believe all aspects pertaining to the US subprime credit defaults have been factored in, there is still some amount of apprehension in the market.

ARM is a borrowing facility with an interest rate that is linked to an economic index. The interest rate and the borrower’s payments are periodically adjusted to the changes in the index. There are pre-determined rate caps to limit the lender from overcharging the borrower.

According to experts, the biggest risk and opportunity happens to be the extent of slowdown in the US. If there is a severe slowdown in the US, then bets are off across all markets, including India. If there is a mild slowdown, where the slack is transferred from housing to capital spending, and to a lesser extent, net exports from the US, growth assets like India will do exceedingly well in the context of an US slowdown. If the US GDP growth slips from around 3.50% to 2.50%, emerging markets including India will do well.

"I think the real economy in the US is in serious trouble. The Fed’s decision to cut lending rates highlights that fact. So, the ARM reprising on September 30 could continue to brew constraints in the real economy. But a big equity market contagion due to subprime is pretty much discounted," said Narayan Ramachandran.

Though the Indian market is trying hard to distance itself from the US subprime market, there is a feeling that there is something worrisome that is lurking in the background.

"Though I am not an expert on this, subprime damage to the US economy is going to be far larger than what we are expecting. The US might go into much deeper recession," said Rakesh Jhunjhunwala.

Echoing Mr Jhunjhunwala’s concern, Nilesh Shah says, "The subprime is $1.2 trillion, and the size of the US is roughly $13 trillion. Subprime is more or less 10% of the total US housing market. Out of the US GDP, housing loan is $11 trillion or approximately 8% of the GDP."

Mr Shah adds, "I am not an expert on the US economy. But I know that today we have smoke in our house because there is fire in American homes. If they don’t put out their fire, we will have more fire. If there is furthermore fire, we will choke and probably become subconscious and their homes will be burnt down. The Fed has taken the first step to bring the extinguisher out. The general feeling is that they will be able to contain it."

Though, no one in the market is sure as to how India would be impacted, there is a feeling that subprime and the US recessionary fears would not muffle Indian market in the long term. Many feel that the long term impact of subprime would be beneficial for India, as people would realise that RBI has curtailed chances of subprime credit defaults in the country.

“I don’t think subprime is a huge problem. It is bound to impact Indian markets only in the short-term,” said Vallabh Bhanshali. Reiterating this, Mr Jhunjhunwala said: “India would only be impacted in the short term. I think, subprime scare will also lead to a fall in commodity prices and interest rates worldwide.”

Another thought process evolving in world markets is the substitution of key markets with the dramatically changing commodities market. Over the past few years, commodities have been changing the world dramatically. Wealth is there with people having ‘commodity tradables’ like oil. Growth is seen everywhere in the commodity spectrum and the cycle has seen unprecedented growth, investment experts say.

ET - ROUNDTABLE

  • FIIs still call shots, but we’re coming
  • CAC: A long way to go
  • That's IT, they just can't agree!
  • They prefer to differ on promoter's warrants issue
  • Just don't ignore subprime
  • And the chorus... Let the interest rates come down
  • How to make the most of Sensex at 17000
  • Greed is good, and so is volatility

Labels: Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

Posted by toughiee at 12:42 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Will the next bubble be in emerging markets?

There is a school of thought which says that the markets have been having one long serial bubble for decades

by Manas Chakravarty

Now that the great housing bubble in the US is bursting, attention has already shifted to where the next bubble will be. A large number of stock market strategists believe that it will be in emerging markets.

Why should we have another bubble? That’s an easy one—with the US Federal Reserve cutting rates by 50 basis points on Tuesday, Ben Bernanke has sent a powerful signal that he is willing to inject liquidity into the markets, brushing aside arguments that those who had lent imprudently should be left to stew in their own juice and that helping them out would create moral hazard, which would encourage further irresponsible risk-taking.

It’s a clear admission that the notion that markets have to go through periodic purges to get rid of their excesses is a non-starter in an age when financial markets are so large that they’re the tail that wags the economy dog.

There’s a school of thought which says that the markets have been having one long serial bubble for decades. It all started with the oil price rise of the 1970s, with the Gulf oil producers accumulating vast surpluses, most of which were funnelled to US banks. That led to a big rise in money supply in the US, setting the stage for a heady bout of lending by mortgage companies, which culminated in the Savings & Loan disaster of the 1980s.

Also at the same time, oil surpluses were lent by the banks to governments in Latin America. Later on in the 1980s, when interest rates rose and the dollar appreciated, these loans turned bad and led these countries into a debt trap.

The 1980s are often spoken of as a “lost decade” in terms of development for Latin America. In the US, the rise in interest rates led to the bust in the savings and loan associations and the biggest rescue operation by the US government in history. That was when, worried by the continuous rise in the value of the dollar and the loss of competitiveness to Japan, the US forced the Plaza Accord down Japan’s throat, forcing it to let the yen appreciate. That led to a fall in the value of the dollar, capital repatriation to Japan and a lowering of interest rates there to rock bottom to keep exports going. It created the mother of all bubbles in Japan, with the Nikkei going up to a stratospheric 39,000 and real estate values going through the roof.

But all bubbles have a nasty habit of popping, and when the Japanese bubble burst, it sent the country into a prolonged depression from which it is yet to recover.

After the bust in Japan, the Asian tigers became the next bubble, with capital flowing like water to these emerging markets. When that huge bubble burst during the Asian crisis, the money hotfooted back to the US, where the tech bubble was waiting to happen.

We all know how that ended and how Alan Greenspan’s rate cuts set the stage for the housing bubble in the US and, in keeping with the spirit of globalization, led to the first truly global bubble.

Coming back to the present, there are two arguments why emerging markets will be the next bubble. One of them, long supported by Michael Hartnett, global emerging markets equity strategist for Merrill Lynch, is that the rate cuts will lead to additional liquidity which will flow into emerging markets with their fast-growing economies.

Their argument is the familiar one of the current credit crisis being 1998 in reverse: while Fed easing in 1998, when there were massive credit problems in Asia, led to a flood of liquidity flowing into largely US tech stocks, this time the credit crunch is in the US and so the money will go to emerging markets.

The other, related view is the one advocated by research firm CLSA’s Russell Napier, who writes: “A new world order is emerging, where Asia and probably Europe lead global economic growth. The future increasingly looks like one where foreign private capital will seek non-US dollar exposure, forcing foreign central bankers to step up support for the US dollar and domestic liquidity creation. Such a seismic shift in global financial markets augurs the birth of a new world order.” In other words, the weak dollar will force central banks to intervene in the foreign exchange markets to mop up dollars and that will release a flood of liquidity into their markets, creating a bubble.

Where’s the catch?

The catch is that the US economy must avoid a recession. Says Hartnett: “Financial crises followed by recession have resulted in bear markets (e.g., US/S&L 1990, Japan/land bubble 1990, US/tech collapse 2000). In contrast, financial crises not followed by recession have resulted in great buying opportunities (e.g., 1987 crash, Mexico 1995, Russia/LTCM 1998). We believe the latter will prove the case this time around for emerging markets.”

But won’t the US slowdown affect other economies as well? It will, but it’s all a question of relative performance. And a country like India, not very dependent on export demand, should do well.

What about the fact that the price-earnings multiples of markets such as China and India are already very high? It’s in the nature of bubbles and manias to forget about valuations. Remember the valuations of tech stocks at the height of the so-called “New Economy” bubble? If Merrill Lynch and CLSA are right, the blowout phase of the bubble could be just beginning.

Additional Reading

  • Emerging Markets And Oil Bubble Up
  • A synchronised boom will bring in a synchronised bust : Marc Faber

Posted by toughiee at 1:03 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Monday, September 17, 2007

Want to know what Rakesh Jhunjhunwala is buying next?

Source: ET - 16th September, 2007

It is 12.30 pm at RaRe Enterprises, Nariman Bhavan. There are five monitors showing more red than blue. The market is facing a blood bath. The Sensex is falling. In the thick of the action, Rakesh Jhunjhunwala turns from these screens, he is unruffled.

There is a massacre happening as investors lose wealth but Mr Jhunjhunwala looks at you almost bored and says “lets not discuss the markets”. The biggest investor in India is chewing paan as he loses wealth on his screens. He lights a cigarette. He loosens his white shirt. He has not worn a tie for the last five years.

“I know I am losing wealth but should I let this bother me? I don’t think so. I would be crazy to look at my wealth like this. I believe that India stands on strong fundamental grounds and over a period things are only positive. But please do not interpret this as Rakesh Jhunjunwalla is saying that the Sensex is going to touch 40000. Some day it may touch. But who knows when?”

For a man who purchased Tata Tea for Rs 5000 when he was only fifteen years old, Rakesh Jhunjhunwala has a total networth of ap-proximately Rs 6000 crore along with his wife Rekha Jhunjhunwala. The exact value of the portfolio is something he doesn’t like to talk about.

He doesn’t have any rules for his science of investing. But his ap-proach is fundamental and takes a long-term view thus he is also re-ferred as the Warren Buffet of India. Jhunjhunwala has never met Warren Buffet but admires and even follows his style of investment.

“Don’t insult the great man by comparing me to him. I am young and I’m constantly learning. There is so much to learn from others.” He pauses and refuses a phone call from a big corporate house in India. “But at the end of the day I want to be only Rakesh Jhunjhunwala and nobody else”, he says.

Retail investors, analysts and fund managers always want to know what he is buying. Everybody wants to be a part of Rakesh’s stocks. He knows that. He leans back and looks at you and tells you that he is not an advisor or a fund manager.

He and his wife came into the limelight with Crisil Limited. At the end of April 2005 he was holding 14.26% of the company, accounting for Rs 70 crore. In the same year the couple made Rs 27 crore after they sold out to the S&P open offer at Rs 775 per share. Today his in-vestment in Crisil is worth more than 200 crore and the holding accounts for 7.63% of the entire company. In all the companies that he has invested, it is this investment that has given him his famed mo-ments.

In India, bull runs have been associated with certain individuals. In the nineties it was Harshad Mehta and in early 2000 it was Ketan Parekh. But Jhunjhunwala does not like to be associated with any booms. He believes that the market is above individuals. Individuals can be associated to excesses in the markets, but not to the phase of the markets itself, he believes. It is like if the market is at a P/E multiple of 20, an individual might just make investors believe that the P/E should be 22. He thinks that individuals who believe that they are bigger than the markets do not last for a long time.

“The market is rational. An individual can never be smarter than the market”, he says and his phone rings. Someone wants to sell him a credit card or personal loans. He politely refuses and drags on his cigarette.

“The market is about greed and fear. Sometimes there is too much greed and sometimes there is too much fear. It has a lot to do with the psychology of the market. You have to sometimes read the market like you read an individual”, he adds.

But Mr Jhunjhunwala has not taken any courses in psychology or behaviorial finance to understand the psychology of the market. He has always believed that psychology cannot be learnt in classrooms. He has learnt his lessons in finance by practicing them and never believed in borrowed wisdom. He has liked his experience first hand. “I have experienced the markets from its core. You know I was there during the day of the bomb blasts when it happened. I have seen ups and downs so my understanding of the market is from being in there”.

That is probably why international fund managers like to spend time with him to understand the Indian equity market. He meets at-least two international fund managers a week. Probably that is where he markets or tries to sell the India story to the global equity fund managers. He doesn’t like it when he is referred in this context.

“How can you sell the Indian equity to the global fund manager? Is it an FMCG product like toothpaste or a shampoo? These fund managers are here because they believe in the fundamentals of the country. Not because a Rakesh Jhunjhunwala wants them to buy Indian equity”. He gets slightly excited.

Incidentally, foreign investors are selling Indian equity as global markets are facing a liquidity crisis. Those who have purchased the India story are jittery. Highly leveraged funds that invest into global markets based on borrowed money are facing the heat. They have purchased assets that they are not able to value. They don’t even un-derstand the nature of these assets.

As the ground beneath their feet starts to shake, Rakesh Jhunjhunwala sits firm. He was in Lonavala watching movies when the crisis was very severe. He is patient and knows that this shall also pass. The red on the screen will turn to blue. The market will once again be the winner. Mr Jhunjhunwala will remember this. His greatest fear - he might fall prey to his own philosophy. The market will remain above all individuals.

At a time when the market is going through volatility and an uncertain phase, Jhunjhunwala has no advice for the investors. “I don’t advice anybody. I don’t manage anybody’s money. I manage my wife’s money because I don’t have a choice.” He smiles and stubs his cigarette

Labels: Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

Posted by toughiee at 12:33 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Has de-coupling happened?

Source: Business Standard

Stock prices come tumbling down in the US, Europe and Asia, but Indian stock prices continue to climb, and the key indices are not far from their all-time highs. The financial and economic news gets from bad to worse in the United States, and the dreaded ‘R’ word (for recession) has begun to get used as the housing market tanks and employment numbers fall for the first time in four years. But Indian markets continue to bounce along, recovering by some 10 per cent from the trough it hit last month. Is it possible that the de-coupling thesis — which says that the Indian market will strike out on a different course from those in the west — is turning out to be true? If so, it would be a striking development, for until now the accepted wisdom was that the foreign institutional investors (FIIs) dictated, through their conduct, the direction of Indian stock prices. If they were investing, Indian prices went up; if they were selling, the prices fell. That no longer seems to be the case; or more correctly, the same institutional investors who are selling in other markets may be buying here. If true, that would mean, among other things, that as part of the “flight to safety”, global investors with a long-term outlook are looking for safe harbour in Indian bourses.

If these optimistic hypotheses are what explain current stock price trends in India, the underlying explanation can only be that the markets are responding to the strengths of the Indian economy. For one thing, the currency risk that is a standard element in emerging market assessments, is not the same any more as the rupee notches up gains against the dollar. But the more important reason is that the Indian growth story has so far been unaffected by the turmoil in global markets and its fall-out. The first-quarter GDP growth numbers have been flattering, industrial growth has maintained its tempo, and companies continue to do well. Exports have decelerated, but agricultural growth will be helped by the good monsoon. Such slowdown as has occurred so far has been on account of domestic factors, mainly the Reserve Bank’s response to the signs of overheating early in the year. Indeed, the onset of the sub-prime crisis in the US has helped India get rid of its problem of plenty, namely a flood of dollars that was adding to domestic money supply and making monetary policy difficult. Indeed, if the Federal Reserve in the US were to cut interest rates next week, as is widely expected, the RBI could do the same here — something that would have been unthinkable three months ago.

Of course, the current economic tempo cannot continue indefinitely; the July industrial production numbers are due this week and will give some pointers, as will the second-quarter corporate sales and profit numbers that will come early next month. But most analysts assume that even if there were to be a slowing of the current tempo, GDP growth in the year as a whole is unlikely to drop below 8.5 per cent — which would be very good going in a rocky global environment. What investors may not have fully recognised, though, is the full impact on corporate bottom line. For the moment, what seems to be true is that the hedge funds that have faced liquidity pressures overseas have been selling their Indian holdings, while long-term players among the FIIs have been busy picking up stocks. If this trend continues, the FII presence in the Indian market will have acquired a healthier hue as the role of the hedge funds gets diluted.

Posted by toughiee at 11:08 AM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Sunday, September 09, 2007

Radhakrishnan Damani: The Return of Mr White & White

Source: ET

March 2007: Investors were jettisoning Tata Steel shares on worries the company may end up with too much debt to finance its acquisition of Corus Steel. The stock was down nearly 20% from its high of Rs 519 touched on January 29, two days before Tata Steel won a long bidding war for Corus.

Intently studying the stock from his trading screen, on the 9th floor of Dalamal House in Nariman Point, was 54-year old ‘White & White’ (one of the many names this legendary investor is known by on Dalal Street). He sensed too much pessimism.

He had been steadily gathering shares of the steel behemoth in small lots over the past month. He was convinced it was time to take the plunge. Mr White & White ordered his dealers to double up their purchases. His voice was calm as ever, though this was his first big bet since his return to the stock market in early 2007 after a six-year hiatus.

Soon, data showed Tata Steel’s cost of debt for the Corus acquisition would be lower than market fears. The fortunes turned and the stock touched a new high of Rs 622. Radha Kishan ‘RK’ Damani, stock market icon, had hit it off again, like an old hunter returned to the jungle. The reclusive investor, always dressed in white and white (hence the nickname), had seen an opportunity in the chaos and make a killing.

Successful speculation is just one facet of Mr Damani, who shuns publicity despite his formidable reputation. He had actually earned his name as one of India’s finest value investors and built his fortune by identifying winners among multinational company stocks during the late 80s and early 90s.

His modest appearance can be deceptive. Mr Damani’s net worth is an elusive figure, but some market players put the number at Rs 5,000 crore. His holdings are spread across a range of companies from 3M India to Samtel India, and he typically holds less than 1% stake.

Old-timers still remember his big-bang victories on the bourses, but Mr Damani quit the markets suddenly in 2001 to dabble in India’s nascent organised retail industry. Over the next five years, he built the D’Mart chain and gained respect as an entrepreneur.

But one day in February this year, just when folks had begun to forget his influence over the stock markets, Mr Damani resurfaced. The question now in everybody’s mind is whether he will regain his old touch. To answer that question, one must probe the man and his investing style.

The man with the Midas touch

Mr Damani started his career as a trader in ball bearings, far from the battlefield of bulls and bears. Following his father’s death, he shut shop and joined his brother’s stock broking business, inherited from their father. Just 32 and lacking knowledge of market dynamics, Mr Damani’s only asset was his keenness to learn.

“He was not a value investor to begin with; he began his career in the stock market as a speculator,” says a Damani watcher. Mr Damani was quick to realise speculation was the not the best way to grow capital. Inspired by the legendary value investor Chandrakant Sampat, he started playing for the long term.

Often, his strategy was simple. When he bet on Indian Shaving Products (now Gillette), his reasoning was, “People will shave no matter what.” It took Mr Damani some time to gain a foothold, and several of his initial bets flopped. But he steadfastly refused to follow the herd, and concentrated on evolving trading strategies of his own.

Gradually, he began getting his calls right, and within the next couple of years he had joined the ranks of the big boys on Dalal Street. “Few players possess the kind of patience he does. But when he is convinced about any stock, he would buy his desired quantity in one sweep. And if he felt that a stock had run its course, he would dump his holdings at one go,” says an associate.

Also noted was his promptness in cutting losses. “Unlike many other players, ego would never get in the way of his booking losses,” says the associate. Mr Damani himself once said, “Cutting your losses is like performing a surgery on one arm with the other; painful, but it has to be done, otherwise the arm may have to be amputated.”

Mr Damani likes to keep a low profile. “He is not very articulate and does not communicate much, but he is a great listener. He patiently hears out everybody and never scoffs at any idea. It is a different matter that at the end of it all, he would back his judgement and instinct,” says the associate.

All along, Mr Damani made some great calls both on the long and short sides of the market. Yet, many players viewed him as a bear rather than a bull. “In India, anybody who is skilled at short selling is frowned upon, the general perception being that short sellers destroy value,” says a close friend of Mr Damani.

His limited circle of friends is said to include Dalal Street’s latest cult figure Rakesh Jhunjhunwala. Often, the market believed they hunted as a pair. Even if one of them was active at a counter, broking circles would say the duo was in it.

A string of successes notwithstanding, it was the epic battle of 1992, in which he emerged victorious, that would mark Mr Damani as a stock market legend. It was the battle with the Big Bull, Harshad Mehta.

Reining in the Big Bull

The flashy Harshad Mehta shot into prominence thanks to a daring rally that lasted the better part of 1991, only to eventually fizzle out in April 1992. Mr Damani, on his part, was bullish on the market only till February 1992. Even as the Big Bull was pumping up the shares, Mr Damani began to go short.

He reasoned blue chips had already run up a lot and fundamentals no longer justified the rally. What Mr Damani had not bargained for was the seemingly limitless supply of funds to Harshad Mehta. The market kept rising, but rather than cutting his losses, Mr Damani rode on his conviction and doubled up his short positions. “The market took off vertically between February to April, and RK was trapped badly,” recalls a veteran broker. “His losses were huge, and if the rally continued for a few more weeks, he may even have had to shut shop.”

But then, it emerged that Harshad had been siphoning off funds from the banking system and using them to buy stocks. When the scam got exposed, the market went into a tailspin. Mr Damani not only regained the lost ground, but walked away with a tidy profit.

Harshad Mehta was to lock horns with Mr Damani once more in 1998, but this time with fatal consequences for the Big Bull. Harshad now focused on three stocks, BPL, Videocon Industries and Sterlite. The prices of these shares touched dizzy levels even as the broader market fell. It was as though Harshad’s picks were defying gravity.

All the time, Mr Damani was biding his time on the sidelines. A disciple of the old school of investing, his assessment was that the stock price had run far beyond fundamentals. At the time he thought was right, he started building short positions.

Prices continued to climb and he had to square off some initial positions at a loss. But soon, signals came that the Big Bull was having trouble financing his positions. And Mr Damani moved in for the kill. He simply doubled his short positions, under the weight of which, the market caved in.

Panic set in. The prices of the three chosen stocks plunged 60%. Some brokers say exchange authorities even tried to bring together Mr Damani and Harshad for a compromise but the talks failed. “It would be wrong to say that RK’s call was motivated by a desire for revenge,” says a market watcher who once worked with Mr Damani.

“It was all about the price... He would have short sold those stocks irrespective of whoever had a bullish view on them,” he says.

When Mr Damani came to know that some small shareholders were left with positions they could not exit, he covered up a part of short positions by buying shares from these investors at a negotiated price. This was not the first time he had done such a thing. In the early 90s, Mr Damani had accumulated a pile of ACC shares.

When a payment crisis loomed, Mr Damani responded to a request from authorities and offloaded a part of his holding at a discount. He was among those probed by regulators for suspected price hammering, but was eventually given a clean chit.

Towards the fag end of 1998, the overall market sentiment began to improve. Before long, the market was in the grip of a bull run led by technology stocks, which would peak out in February 2000. RK continued to trade, but those close to him say he had already begun scaling down the number and size of his bets.

Was he preparing for a self-imposed exile from the market beginning somewhere in 2001 for the next few years? Friends say he was always passionate about retailing, but were there other factors also that influenced Mr Damani to retreat from Dalal Street?

After the stock market crash of 2001, bear operators were once again under the regulatory scanner, the allegation being that they had colluded to hammer stock prices. Needless to say, Mr Damani also figured on the list of suspects. “Like any other operator, RK made most of his money being on the long side of the market,” says a broker who knows Mr Damani for long.

“He had a finger on the pulse of the market and would not hesitate to sell short if the situation called for it. Unfortunately, his short (selling) calls attracted more attention than some of his long (buying) calls,” he says.

Some players say that Mr Damani found himself a bit out of depth during the technology boom of 1999-2000. He stuck to the classic rules of trading, short selling shares that he felt were over valued and going long on the under valued ones.

But stocks from the sectors that he had an sound understanding of, cement, automobile, steel, were out of favour. Technology was the buzzword at the bourse, and irrespective of whether those companies were making money or not, investors were falling over each other to buy into them.

And Ketan Parekh had now taken over the as the reigning Big Bull, and carved out a reputation for himself as a champion of new economy stocks. Mr Damani’s old school strategies did not work well for him in this period.

The comeback

If anyone had not noticed, Mr Damani’s right calls on Tata Steel and State bank of India made them aware of his return to the stock market this year. But this time, it has been a mixed bag of hits and misses, those close to him say. “Over the last one month, he has been as successful or unsuccessful as other players in his league,” says a Damani watcher.

It may be premature to judge the old fox when the markets have not shown a clear trend. India, like other equity markets around the world, has been volatile over the last month as a result of the crisis involving sub-prime loans in the US. It is anybody’s guess how things will go from here.

The market has also undergone a sea change during Mr Damani’s absence. The number of participants, stocks and liquidity have risen manifold. If there is greater transparency, there is also more volatility to contend with. Admirers or critics, everyone is impatient to know whether and how Mr Damani is going to pull it off this time.

Posted by toughiee at 12:08 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

BSE Sensex Fair Value Estimates

Click on the image to enlarge

Posted by toughiee at 5:22 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Monday, September 03, 2007

Why active investing doesn’t work

Peter Bernstein writes,

“It is a paradox, but nevertheless true that stock prices are so hard to predict because stock prices are themselves predictions of the future.”

“But a respect for evidence compels me to incline towards the hypothesis that most portfolio decision makers should go out of business - take up plumbing, teach Greek, or help produce the annual GNP by services as corporate executives (sic). Even if this advice to drop dead is good advice, it obviously is not counsel that will be eagerly followed. Few people will commit suicide without a push.” —Paul Samuelson

Stay away from fund managers who believe in active investing, or so Samuelson, the first winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics, seems to be suggesting in that quote, perhaps favouring investment in index funds. And what makes him do that?

Peter L Bernstein may have an answer. “In 2004, Burton Malkiel of Princeton, and author of A Random Walk Down Wall Street, studied all mutual funds in existence since 1970 - a total of 139 funds surviving over more than thirty years. He found that seventy six of the funds underperformed the market by more than one percentage point a year; only four funds outperformed by more than two percentage points a year.

Malkiel reports that more than 80 percent of the actively managed large capitalisation funds covered in the Lipper Analytical Services failed to match the returns of S&P 500 over periods of longer than ten years ending in 2003. Malkiel also points out that “there’s almost no persistence in excess performance……In decade after decade, the top funds in one period are often the bottom funds in the next… There’s no way to tell in advance which funds will outperform,”” Bernstein writes in Capital Ideas Evolving.

To cut a long story short, there is very little evidence that active investing works. Even if a fund manager has delivered better returns than the market, over a period of time, how does an investor identify him in advance? “If identification of superior managers becomes a simple matter for investors in general, those mangers will be buried under an avalanche of new money to a point where they will no longer be able to pursue the investment strategies that delivered the superior performance. There is a tipping point somewhere for every manager, regardless of skill and style,” writes Bernstein.

“The long history of mutual funds shows that superior performance, even in the short run, tends to attract new assets that swell the size of the portfolio under management. As assets under management increase, the costs of trading tend to follow suit, and the edge of the active manager begins to diminish.”

The primary reason why fund managers find it difficult to beat the returns of the market is that stock prices are so tough to predict. The other reason that makes active management of money difficult, is volatility. “Volatility - a fancy word for what happens when we are taken by surprise - is a vivid indicator of how ignorant of the future we are and how emotionally we respond when the future arrives and fails to conform to our expectations,” writes Bernstein.

Bernstein takes the help of Robert Shiller to take the point forward. “As Shiller interprets it, volatility means people are changing their minds about the future almost from moment to moment. And why? New information arrives that is different from what they had been expecting.

But, there is no need to believe that the new information is necessarily correct information or readily understandable information, or even the kind of information people should be heeding. In Shiller’s opinion, the so-called information on which investors base their decisions is a jumble of many factors that go beyond the cold facts of the economic fundamentals or the latest corporate earnings reports.”

“To Shiller, excess volatility implies “that changes occur for no fundamental reason at all.” The swings in stock prices seem to reflect investors’ attention to many factors other than the present value of future stream of dividend payments: fads and fashions, fears and hopes, rumor and restlessness, recent stock price performance, or old saws about how in the long run everything comes out rosy in the stock market”, writes Bernstein.

And since the herd likes to think in a similar way the asset pricing decisions are almost always wrong.

As Bernstein writes

“ When many investors are using the same kind of rules of thumb and arrive at similar kinds of beliefs about the future, asset prices are almost always wrong in the sense that the return investors anticipate is chronically too high or too low relative to the risks involved.”
In the world of active investment, almost everyone is trying to throw darts in the dark. “When you know only a little, and you know you know only a little, it is tempting to believe others may know more, especially when markets are moving strongly in one direction or another”, writes Bernstein.

Given this, luck starts playing a very important part.

As Bernstein writes,

“As a matter of luck, any portfolio manager can end up beating the market in short periods of time. Luck puts other managers below the market for short periods of time.”

Hence, very few active managers like Warren Buffett, Bill Miller and Peter Lynch have been able to beat the markets, year-on-year, over a long period.

Posted by toughiee at 7:30 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Random Musings

  • Open season

    Should investors press the sell button when open offers come at a premium to prevailing share prices? A ready reckoner

  • Investment should not dance to market tunes

    When the bears dare to eat into the capital, hold on to your investments till the bulls return to recoup these capital losses.

  • The Indian investor gets savvier

    Domestic investors are showing greater maturity in the face of global turmoil as they keep faith in the market. The confidence stems from the fact that India’s growth is shielded from global upheavals.

  • PE on prowl

    The Board of Directors of Nagarjuna Construction Company has accorded its in-principle approval for issue of two crore shares and 91 lakh convertible warrants, aggregating to Rs 615 crore to the US-based private equity giant Blackstone

  • When stocks get ‘re-’ or ‘de-rated’

    Just as a re-rating can inflate returns from stocks of high-growth companies, a de-rating coupled with slowing earnings growth can be a double whammy for investors.

Posted by toughiee at 6:03 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Search


Compilations

  • Warren Buffett
  • Charlie Munger
  • Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

Last posts

  • Site Moved!
  • The real reason why oil prices are rising
  • New Blog!
  • How to think like J.P. Morgan?
  • They're wrong about oil
  • Investment Nuggets by Benjamin Graham
  • ‘Returns dip as motion rises’
  • Hunt for The Bottom!
  • What happened to India story?
  • Who should you trust your money with?

Archives

  • November 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008

About This Blog

  • Get on Mobile
  • Atom Feeds
  • Disclaimer
  • Email to Owner

Blog Directories

  • Stockblogs

Related Blogs

  • DeepWealth
  • Dardashti
  • Ridgewood Group
  • Trading Day by Day

Business Papers

  • Economic Times
  • Business Standard
  • Business Line
  • Financial Express
  • DNA Money

Business News

  • Capital Market
  • Equitymaster
  • India Infoline
  • Moneycontrol.com
  • Yahoo! India Finance
  • ICICIdirect

Results

  • India Earnings

Quotes & Stats

  • Asian Indices
  • All Indian Quotes
  • Indian ADRs
  • Indian GDRs
  • Arbitrage
  • Sector Classification
  • FII Trends
  • MF Trends
  • NSE Heat Map
  • Insider Trading
  • BC/RD
  • BM (Company)
  • BM (Date)
  • BSE Bulk Deals
  • NSE Bulk Deals
  • NSE Block Deals
  • US Indices
  • US Pre-Market
  • US After Hours
  • CBOE VIX
  • European Indices
  • Commodity/Currency
  • Nymex Light Crude Oil
  • Nymex Natural Gas
  • Nymex Gold
  • Nymex Silver
  • Nymex Copper
  • All In One

Equity Analysis

  • Kotak Street
  • Moneypore
  • Geojit
  • IDBI
  • Naviamarkets
  • ET Big Bucks
  • BS Smart Investor
  • FE Investor
  • BL Investment World

Screeners

  • Equitymaster
  • ICICIdirect

Research Reports

  • Moneycontrol

Technical Analysis

  • ICICIdirect
  • Yahoo! Finance

E-Books

  • Value Investing
  • Trading & Technicals
  • Gann
  • Elliott Wave
  • Risk Management
  • Derivatives

Misc. Links

  • BSE
  • NSE
  • SEBI
  • SEBI Edifar
  • Corp. Filings
  • WatchOutInvestors

Global Research

  • Morgan Stanley GEF
  • Hussman Funds

Interactive

  • Online Chat
Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]
Powered by Blogger