Value-Stock-Plus

Informed Investing!

Investing is most intelligent when it is most businesslike - Benjamin Graham (1894-1976)

____________________________________________________________________

Value-Stock-Plus stands at No. 50 in the list of Top 100 Finance Blogs  by ValueWiki

Recognised by The Economic Times as one of the most popular financial blog

Updated! Compilation on Warren Buffett, Rakesh Jhunjhunwala & Charlie Munger
____________________________________________________________________

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Bought stocks? Do nothing and get rich

by Arnav Pandya - BS

While investing in stocks or mutual funds, investors use several strategies. Aggressive selling on a downturn, buying on hints of an upward movement and even investing on hot tips from friends are some of them.

However, a very successful approach that a lot of people seldom use is inaction. This method, if effectively used, can cure a lot of financial headaches.

Basically, when you take a call on selling or buying an investment product, you are giving the signal that this product has completed its shelf-life or will add value to your portfolio. Holding an investment for long periods of time indicates that this investment product is good for your portfolio. There are several situations in which you can use this strategy.

Lack of options: There could be time periods when you do not have a worthy option. Any investment decision is based on expectations about the future performance of the asset class. If there are no such products, then it is best to sit tight with the existing investments.

In such a situation, though it may appear that you are not taking any action, the inaction, itself will help you prevent erosion of wealth. For example, if you believe that all the asset classes such as equities, real estate and commodities are overvalued, then not churning your portfolio at this stage may be a great idea.

Cash in hand: Sometimes, you could have an investible surplus but no opportunities. During such times, it might not make great sense to immediately deploy the funds because the present conditions may not help you to earn good returns.

Yes, keeping idle cash is not a great idea. But then, investment products capable of giving good returns should be available as well. If the expectation is that the investment avenue is good but the time is not right to invest, then some waiting helps. This also implies that there are expectations of a possible fall in the value of that asset. A good example of this situation is when an equity investor has cash and is waiting for the market to stabilise before deploying it.

Short-term volatility: As all investment advisors will say, it is always important to be in the equities market for the long-term for good returns. However, it is noticed that investors exit the market in panic or enter when the market has already peaked. It is important that when you are in it for the long-term, you ignore short-term movements.

Obviously, this means having more patience, a firm belief in your choices and not getting ulcers when the market moves against you. This especially applies when you are following a systematic approach towards investment such as a systematic investment plan (SIP) in mutual funds. A tanking market could really unnerve you. But it is best to just quietly and keep investing.

Remember, falling prices of shares mean more units of the fund. And all those units count in the long run. Also, there could be times when you have particular financial goals and disciplined investment is the only way to achieve them. In such a situation, irrespective of the market conditions, you will need to keep on investing. Following a plan is absolutely necessary to achieve your goals. Inaction, in reality, could actually mean affirmative action in such cases.

The writer is a certified financial planner.

Posted by toughiee at 4:44 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

How To Select Shares For Your Portfolio?

by David Opoku

Investors employ a multiplicity of techniques in choosing shares. What is common amongst the various methods is that they don't always work. The suggestions made in this discussion combined with common sense and good judgment should help to hone your stock selection skills.

The first step in the selection process is asking yourself a few questions to help clarify exactly what you want and expect from your investment. It is immensely necessary to endeavour to find out the amount of risk you are prepared to take. Look back, and recall how you felt when you incurred some financial losses. Such memories, with some amount of honesty should help you to find out your level of risk tolerance.

Companies on the stock market are grouped on two main basis: in terms of similarity in size, and on grounds of carrying out the same activities (sector grouping). If your analysis shows you are risk-loving, then your focus should be on smaller companies or growth companies which are generally riskier, with potential for higher returns. If you happen to be the risk averse type or you want a share with minimum maintenance, then you want to consider large organisations, which have a lower tendency to go bust and can also serve as more reliable source of income. Such firms are known as ‘blue chips’. Target shares in industries or sectors that will be positively impacted on my political ventures and economic trends.

After considering the category of companies you want to deal with, you should begin inspecting the dividend yields and P/E ratios of the companies. It is a good idea to be on the look out for companies with reasonably high dividend yields. A P/E ratio between 7 and 10 is very much recommended. Remember that a P/E ratio is only useful when compared to others. Consider companies with P/E ratios that are lower than those of competitors in the same industry, and also lower than the previous years’ figures. The yearly sales and earning per share figures should ideally be increasing over the previous years. It’s a good idea to consider growth companies that have fallen on hard times, but shows signs of future recovery.

You should also decide how long you will be holding the share for. You will thus be on the alert, when it is time to get rid of the share. Higher returns will be earned when a share is held for a minimum of 5 years, with substantial savings in dealing expenses. This, nonetheless, does not mean that duds should not be turfed out before their planned disposal dates. Accordingly, a winner should not be gotten rid of just because it has had a decent run. Tact should be exercised before selling shares and it is good technique to keep an eye on the next share to grab, once the old one is gone.

Do not catch a falling knife. Although it is good practice to buy cheap shares, some shares suffer a free fall in price, and stay cheaper and cheaper with the passage of time. These should be avoided. Also eschew shares recommended by newspapers and tipsheets. The explanation for this is that market makers also read newspapers, and by the time you lay hands on the share, every advantage it has would have been already siphoned out by professional investors, especially, if you’re considering a blue chip. If you want to try your luck in securing a winner you may have to rummage financial statements of companies that have capitalisation less that £100 million. Such companies do not attract professionals, hopeful you can beat the market here.

It is almost impossible to outperform the market extensively. What you want to avoid is losses. A long-term goal of tracking the market, or better still performing slightly better than it is quite realistic and dignified. You should decide to what extent you want to get involved with the management of the share. If you want to be mildly involved, you will be better off investing in mutual funds or investment trusts rather than picking your own shares. Be prepared to buy investment management, when necessary.

Posted by toughiee at 3:17 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Quotes from Warren Buffett

Year 2007 is drawing to a close & our markets are entering into 5th year of the bull market. So, now is the time to look into retrospect, and have a close look at our investing triumphs & failures. And, what could be better than learning from the Master Stockpicker, Warren Buffett himself.

Here are some of his best quotes:

  1. If past history was all there was to the game, the richest people would be librarians.
  2. In the business world, the rearview mirror is always clearer than the windshield.
  3. It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently.
  4. It's better to hang out with people better than you. Pick out associates whose behavior is better than yours and you'll drift in that direction.
  5. It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.
  6. Let blockheads read what blockheads wrote.
  7. Look at market fluctuations as your friend rather than your enemy; profit from folly rather than participate in it.
  8. Of the billionaires I have known, money just brings out the basic traits in them. If they were jerks before they had money, they are simply jerks with a billion dollars.
  9. Only buy something that you'd be perfectly happy to hold if the market shut down for 10 years.
  10. When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact.
  11. Why not invest your assets in the companies you really like? As Mae West said, "Too much of a good thing can be wonderful".
  12. Wide diversification is only required when investors do not understand what they are doing.
  13. You do things when the opportunities come along. I've had periods in my life when I've had a bundle of ideas come along, and I've had long dry spells. If I get an idea next week, I'll do something. If not, I won't do a damn thing.
  14. You only have to do a very few things right in your life so long as you don't do too many things wrong.
  15. Your premium brand had better be delivering something special, or it's not going to get the business.
  16. Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's been swimming naked.
  17. Our favorite holding period is forever.
  18. Our favourite holding period is forever.
  19. Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.
  20. Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing.
  21. Risk is a part of God's game, alike for men and nations.
  22. Rule No.1: Never lose money. Rule No.2: Never forget rule No.1
  23. Should you find yourself in a chronically leaking boat, energy devoted to changing vessels is likely to be more productive than energy devoted to patching leaks.
  24. The business schools reward difficult complex behavior more than simple behavior, but simple behavior is more effective. The first rule is not to lose. The second rule is not to forget the first rule.
  25. The investor of today does not profit from yesterday's growth.
  26. The only time to buy these is on a day with no "y" in it.
  27. The smarter the journalists are, the better off society is. For to a degree, people read the press to inform themselves-and the better the teacher, the better the student body.
  28. Time is the friend of the wonderful company, the enemy of the mediocre.
  29. Value is what you get.
  30. We believe that according the name 'investors' to institutions that trade actively is like calling someone who repeatedly engages in one-night stands a 'romantic.'
  31. We enjoy the process far more than the proceeds.
  32. We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful.
  33. When a management team with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact.
  34. A public-opinion poll is no substitute for thought.
  35. Chains of habit are too light to be felt until they are too heavy to be broken.
  36. I always knew I was going to be rich. I don't think I ever doubted it for a minute.
  37. I am quite serious when I say that I do not believe there are, on the whole earth besides, so many intensified bores as in these United States. No man can form an adequate idea of the real meaning of the word, without coming here.
  38. I buy expensive suits. They just look cheap on me.
  39. I don't look to jump over 7-foot bars: I look around for 1-foot bars that I can step over.
  40. I never attempt to make money on the stock market. I buy on the assumption that they could close the market the next day and not reopen it for five years.
  41. If a business does well, the stock eventually follows.
...and here comes my favorite!
  • There seems to be some perverse human characteristic that likes to make easy things difficult.

Posted by toughiee at 6:46 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Monday, December 24, 2007

Season's Greetings!

Merry Christmas & Happy New Year!

- Toughiee

Posted by toughiee at 10:07 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Excess returns: All about market timing

Can market timing generate excess returns? This article argues that excess returns are possible as long as assets price our idiosyncratic behaviour such as loss aversion. A portfolio manager should follow time diversification strategies to capture such idiosyncrasies and follow strict money management rules to control risk.

B. Venkatesh

Asset prices are galloping at a fast pace in the Indian market. Many investors have not participated in the recent uptrend for the fear of a sharp turn in prices. Market timing is, hence, a relevant topic in the current environment.

Professor Javier Estrada’s paper “Black Swans and Market Timing: How not to generate alpha” concludes that “market timing is an entertaining pastime but not a good way to make money.” He argues that if a portfolio manager misses the ten best days in the market, the portfolio annual returns reduce by 3 percentage points.

Likewise, avoiding the ten worst days increases the annual returns by 4 percentage points. As no portfolio manager knows the best and worst days’ ex-ante (before the event), Estrada states that market timing is a wasteful exercise. This article argues that disciplined money managers following time-diversification strategies can generate alpha from market-timing.

Alpha Generation

Alpha is the excess returns that the portfolio generates because of manager skill. Alpha will be 5 percentage points if the portfolio generates 25 per cent when the Nifty moves 20 per cent. Alpha can be generated through market timing or by holding stocks that outperform the market. Some argue that alpha returns will decrease with the proliferation of institutional investors and hedge funds; for more funds will chase alpha-generating assets.

But this argument may not be entirely true. Why? The total available alpha is unknown.

So, even as new funds emerge to harvest alpha, newer sources for alpha generation will evolve. The argument is the same as in the case with oil. As crude oil prices climb, the world is working hard to develop alternative sources of fuel.

Market timing

Generating alpha from market timing involves using technical analysis, which trades on human behaviour.

Take Essar Oil. The stock hit Rs 70 this September and declined to Rs 49. The next time the stock hit Rs 70 in November, it jumped to Rs 250 in 16 days. Why? Experts in behavioural finance have shown that we suffer from loss aversion. That is, we tend to keep losers in our portfolio too long and sell winners too soon. Perhaps, that is what happened with Essar Oil. This stock failed to move past Rs 70 early this January; investors who bought then saw the stock decline to Rs 46. So, the next time the stock moved to Rs 70 in September, most investors sold. The higher supply of shares at Rs 70 pushed the stock price down yet again. Technical analysts would call Rs 70 as the “resistance level”.

After naïve investors offloaded their supplies in September, smart traders gathered critical mass and eventually pushed the stock beyond Rs 70, which now becomes the “break-out” level. A money manager can generate alpha from market timing as long as we all suffer from loss aversion and other idiosyncrasies.

Pareto Principle

Estrada is right. Only a few trading days contribute substantially to portfolio returns. But you know that Pareto Principle holds true in all walks of life. Eighty per cent of your work gets done in 20 per cent of the time that you spend in the office! In the markets, 20 per cent of the stocks in your portfolio contribute nearly 80 per cent of your total returns. Likewise, 20 per cent of the total trading days account for 80 per cent of the positive returns in the market.

Money managers, hence, follow time-diversification to minimise the risk due to loss aversion. Understand that loss-aversion leads to selling winners early and losing the best 10 days in the market. It could also lead to carrying losses and staying in the market during the worst 10 days. Time diversification means that the portfolio manager has exposure across various time horizons. The portfolio will have stocks for the short-term (5 to 30 days), some for the medium-term (30 days to 12 months) and some for the long-term (over 12 months).

This ensures that the manager is engaged in active trading through the year and so does not take profits too soon. Remember, we take profits too soon because we need to see cash flowing into our account at regular intervals. Time diversification also ensures that the portfolio rides through the 20 per cent positive days in any year.

Black swans

Black swans refer to extreme events, such as a market crash. If a money manager does not manage the ten worst days effectively, she is likely to lose all the profits. Professional money managers, hence, follow strict money management methods, such as stop-loss rules to control portfolio risk. The problem is that all managers are not disciplined — they suffer from loss aversion too! And that is when market timing leads to negative alpha.

Posted by toughiee at 12:33 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

2007 Stock Market Outlook, Part IV

"Global Markets Will Weather Worries"

Download

Source: Fisher Investments

Posted by toughiee at 12:20 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Friday, December 07, 2007

Short-term performance is a meaningless metric

by Arne Alsin

The market is chock-full of short-term performance chasers. These are investors who steer their capital toward investment managers who have generated recent hot performance. By the way, I consider anything less than five years to be short-term.

Short-term performance chasers tend to be emotional and impulsive. When an investment strategy is not working investors get frustrated. Switching to a different strategy (or manager) is seen as a fix. The problem is that short-term performance-chasing leads to underperformance, not outperformance.

For example, at the peak in the Nasdaq in March 2000, investors piled into growth and technology funds because those funds had terrific one-, three-, and five-year track records. Of the 50 most popular mutual funds – measured by the amount of investor inflows for the 12 months ending in March 2000 – 48 underperformed the average fund over the next five years.

How did the most unpopular funds perform? The 50 funds with the largest outflows in the preceding 12 months gained an average of 21 per cent over the next five years against a 1 per cent gain for the average fund.

There are several reasons why this performance-chasing fails to boost returns.

Great performance is not coincident with great management

Performance is a lagging indicator of investment decision-making. More often than not when a money manager makes an exceptionally smart stock purchase, the wisdom of that move is not evident for several months or even a couple of years. Multi-bagger stocks often look quite average, even mediocre, during the first year or two of ownership.

Reversion to the mean

This dynamic – that performance eventually reverts to the average – is an overwhelming force in the market. While it should be a big issue for investors, it is largely ignored. On this I’ll be blunt: some money managers are incompetent. The problem for short-term performance chasers is that incompetent managers can have a run of luck. When the luck turns, investors who buy based on a couple of years of hot performance can get blindsided. Since most managers underperform the market over the long term, investors should view short-term outperformance with suspicion.

Misperception of risk

Short-term performance chasers act based on a flawed understanding of risk. Consider this example: fund manager A pays $60 each for several stocks that he accurately calculates to be worth $100 each. This is a good decision. Shortly thereafter, each stock rises to $100. His rate of return is terrific, at 67 per cent.

Investors react in predictable fashion. They pour money into the fund because fund manager A has produced such a high return. But if the portfolio stays the same, risk has escalated significantly because the assets are no longer held at a big discount to value.

Another manager, fund manager B, also pays $60 each for several stocks that he accurately calculates to be worth $100 each. As with fund manager A, this is a good decision. But, shortly thereafter each stock falls to $45. The fund is down by 25 per cent.

Investors react predictably to a 25 per cent decline and flee fund manager B in droves. The investors have made a mistake. If we assume, like the example above, that the portfolio stays the same, the assets are now very low risk. That is because value now exceeds price by a wider margin that when they were originally purchased. It also follows that investors are fleeing just when their expected return is exceptionally high; eventually the $45 quote for each stock will migrate to the asset value of $100.

Short-term performance has nothing to do with the decision-making skills of fund managers A and B. The managers made equally good decisions. One was lucky because quotes quickly jumped to fair value. The other was unlucky because cheap prices got even cheaper.

Investors see a “cause and effect” in short-term performance

Implicit in the flow of funds into fund manager A and away from fund manager B is that investors think short-term performance is an indicator of skill. In fact, short-term performance is generally a meaningless metric. Consider the Sequoia Fund, a fund that was led by a superb money manager, Bill Ruane, who passed away last year.

For the first four years of the Sequoia Fund (beginning in 1970), Ruane lagged behind the S&P 500 by a big margin – an average of about 8 per cent a year. Did that indicate that this disciple of value investor Ben Graham was lacking in skill? Not at all.

Arne Alsin is a fund manager for Alsin Capital and the Turnaround fund

arne@alsincapital.com

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007

Posted by toughiee at 10:44 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Search


Compilations

  • Warren Buffett
  • Charlie Munger
  • Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

Last posts

  • Site Moved!
  • The real reason why oil prices are rising
  • New Blog!
  • How to think like J.P. Morgan?
  • They're wrong about oil
  • Investment Nuggets by Benjamin Graham
  • ‘Returns dip as motion rises’
  • Hunt for The Bottom!
  • What happened to India story?
  • Who should you trust your money with?

Archives

  • November 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008

About This Blog

  • Get on Mobile
  • Atom Feeds
  • Disclaimer
  • Email to Owner

Blog Directories

  • Stockblogs

Related Blogs

  • DeepWealth
  • Dardashti
  • Ridgewood Group
  • Trading Day by Day

Business Papers

  • Economic Times
  • Business Standard
  • Business Line
  • Financial Express
  • DNA Money

Business News

  • Capital Market
  • Equitymaster
  • India Infoline
  • Moneycontrol.com
  • Yahoo! India Finance
  • ICICIdirect

Results

  • India Earnings

Quotes & Stats

  • Asian Indices
  • All Indian Quotes
  • Indian ADRs
  • Indian GDRs
  • Arbitrage
  • Sector Classification
  • FII Trends
  • MF Trends
  • NSE Heat Map
  • Insider Trading
  • BC/RD
  • BM (Company)
  • BM (Date)
  • BSE Bulk Deals
  • NSE Bulk Deals
  • NSE Block Deals
  • US Indices
  • US Pre-Market
  • US After Hours
  • CBOE VIX
  • European Indices
  • Commodity/Currency
  • Nymex Light Crude Oil
  • Nymex Natural Gas
  • Nymex Gold
  • Nymex Silver
  • Nymex Copper
  • All In One

Equity Analysis

  • Kotak Street
  • Moneypore
  • Geojit
  • IDBI
  • Naviamarkets
  • ET Big Bucks
  • BS Smart Investor
  • FE Investor
  • BL Investment World

Screeners

  • Equitymaster
  • ICICIdirect

Research Reports

  • Moneycontrol

Technical Analysis

  • ICICIdirect
  • Yahoo! Finance

E-Books

  • Value Investing
  • Trading & Technicals
  • Gann
  • Elliott Wave
  • Risk Management
  • Derivatives

Misc. Links

  • BSE
  • NSE
  • SEBI
  • SEBI Edifar
  • Corp. Filings
  • WatchOutInvestors

Global Research

  • Morgan Stanley GEF
  • Hussman Funds

Interactive

  • Online Chat
Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]
Powered by Blogger