Value-Stock-Plus

Informed Investing!

Investing is most intelligent when it is most businesslike - Benjamin Graham (1894-1976)

____________________________________________________________________

Value-Stock-Plus stands at No. 50 in the list of Top 100 Finance Blogs  by ValueWiki

Recognised by The Economic Times as one of the most popular financial blog

Updated! Compilation on Warren Buffett, Rakesh Jhunjhunwala & Charlie Munger
____________________________________________________________________

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Beware of value pretenders

In a classic “Margin of safety”, the author, Seth A. Klarman, coins a new term “value pretenders” for the large number of pseudo value investors.

“Value investing” is one of the most overused and inconsistently applied terms in the investment business. A broad range of strategies make use of value investing as a pseudonym. Many have little or nothing to do with the philosophy of investing originally espoused by Graham. The misuse of the value label accelerated in the mid-1980s in the wake of increasing publicity given to the long-term successes of true value investors such as Buffett at Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Michael Price and the late Max L. Heine at Mutual Series Fund, Inc., and William Ruane and Richard Cunniff at the Sequoia Fund, Inc., among others. Their results attracted a great many “value pretenders,” investment chameleons who frequently change strategies in order to attract funds to manage.

These value pretenders are not true value investors, disciplined craftspeople who understand and accept the wisdom of the value approach. Rather they are charlatans who violate the conservative dictates of value investing, using inflated business valuations, overpaying for securities, and failing to achieve a margin of safety for their clients. These investors, despite (or perhaps as a direct result of) their imprudence, are able to achieve good investment results in times of rising markets. During the latter half of the 1980s, value pretenders gained widespread acceptance, earning high, even spectacular, returns. Many of them benefitted from the overstated private-market values that were prevalent during those years; when business valuations returned to historical levels in 1990, however, most value pretenders suffered substantial losses.

To some extent value, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder; virtually any security may appear to be a bargain to someone. It is hard to prove an overly optimistic investor wrong in the short run since value is not precisely measurable and since stocks can remain overvalued for a long time. Accordingly, the buyer of virtually any security can claim to be a value investor at least for a while.

Ironically, many true value investors fell into disfavor during the late 1980s. As they avoided participating in the fully valued and overvalued securities that the value pretenders claimed to be bargains, many of them temporarily underperformed the results achieved by the value pretenders. The most conservative were actually criticized for their “excessive” caution, prudence that proved well founded in 1990.

Even today many of the value pretenders have not been defrocked of their value-investor mantle. There were many articles in financial periodicals chronicling the poor investment results posted by many so-called value investors in 1990. The top of the list, needles to say, was dominated by value pretenders.”

Posted by toughiee at 2:40 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Valuing realty stocks is not easy

Earnings may not be the right way to value a company’s stock, as they depend on whether an asset is sold or leased out

by Manas Chakravarty - HT Mint

Real-estate developer Unitech Ltd had a blockbuster year last fiscal, with sales jumping by four times to Rs2,504 crore. What’s more, operating profit leaped by nearly 12 times to Rs1,412 crore. The picture was no different with the company’s consolidated results. Unitech’s consolidated EPS (earnings per share) now stands at Rs16.10, based on which it trades at 35 times trailing earnings. Last year, the stock traded at 200 times earnings.

Part of the reason for the firm beating all expectations is because of the sale of its stake in IT parks to Unitech Corporate Parks. That’s a one-time boost, and nobody expects the same kind of growth next year. Nevertheless, on the basis of Macquarie Research’s estimates released in February this year, its EPS is estimated to be Rs25 in FY08. Based on these estimates, Unitech’s valuation works out to a reasonable 22 times earnings.

But earnings may not be the right way to value a company’s stock. As the DLF management has pointed out, the reason they chose to sell a portion of their commercial assets to a group company, in spite of normally leasing such assets, was to show the earnings potential in the asset. Earnings in a year depend, therefore, on whether an asset is sold or leased out. That’s the reason analysts prefer net asset value (NAV) as the key driver of real estate stocks. In fact, the company’s stock has risen by less than 4% since its excellent results were announced. The problem is, in Unitech’s case, estimates of its NAV range from under Rs400 to more than Rs600. Also, one has to compute the potential unlocking of value from selling off stakes in other activities, such as the hotel business.

Whatever the NAV, it’s important to note that the Unitech stock has moved sharply ever since DLF got approval for its IPO (initial public offering) on 7 May. Since then, the stock has risen by 34%, from Rs424 to Rs567. Market experts say the DLF issue has improved the sentiment for real-estate stocks. But in an interesting twist, bankers to the DLF issue now point to Unitech’s share price and the fact that it is trading at a premium to its NAV to justify DLF’s IPO pricing. With each company propping up each other’s valuations, it’s evident that the markets still have a long way to go in learning how to value real-estate stocks.

Posted by toughiee at 11:23 AM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Stockmarkets: A stealth correction!

Source: Akash Prakash - Business Standard

The Indian markets are not as overextended as commonly perceived, and are largely in correction mode.

If you talk to most investors, you will find them a disgruntled and frustrated lot, which is surprising given that Indian financial markets are having the time of their lives, or so it is commonly perceived. If you were to read the general papers, you would also think that we are in the midst of a huge bull market, and for most new investors the biggest worry about India is a feeling of the markets being highly overextended. They feel they have missed the run.

While it is true that the markets have had a dream run since 2003, rising by 370 per cent, the performance of the last 12 months has been very different from the three years prior to that. Rising from a level of deep undervaluation and investor scepticism, the first three years of the bull run were a time of broad market participation and the market seemed like a rising tide that lifts all boats. The last 12 months have been quite different.

The Sensex is up only about 11 per cent in rupee terms over the last 12 months, with the MSCI-India index up about 23 per cent in dollars and 13 per cent in rupees. So global investors have benefited from rupee appreciation, and got much higher returns than the locals. While the headline performance numbers mentioned above are decent and competitive, they hide the extremely weak breadth of returns.

As a recent strategy report published by Morgan Stanley in India (dated May 15, 2007) highlights, while the Sensex may have given us returns of about 10-11 per cent over the past 12 months, this entire return is due to only five stocks. Reliance Industries, Bharti, Infosys, Reliance Communications and ICICI Bank have accounted for approximately 130 per cent of the Sensex return of the past 12 months, implying that if you did not own these five stocks but everything else in the Sensex, then you would have had a negative return. It was not always like this; markets have not always been so narrow, as between 2003 and 2006, the top five performing stocks in the Sensex accounted for about 50 per cent of the index performance (source: Morgan Stanley).

This phenomenon is not restricted to the Sensex, but actually gets even worse as you look at a broader basket of stocks. Morgan Stanley has highlighted in its report that the median return of the market over the last 12 months is actually -17 per cent. They have looked at a basket of 2,389 stocks that actually traded over the past 12 months, and pointed out that 67 per cent of these stocks actually delivered a negative return, and while the median return of this entire universe is -17 per cent, the median return of the 67 per cent of stocks which declined was -30 per cent. Now this hardly seems like a raging bull market, does it? Two out of every three stocks that traded over the past year are actually down, and that too quite significantly.

The above statistics highlight just how difficult it has been to make money over the past 12 months and also why most funds have found the going so treacherous. It is understandable why the majority of funds have found it so difficult to beat the market. Either you were in the five stocks highlighted above, or most likely you have underperformed and not made money.

Now what are the implications of such a narrow market? The positive spin to this is that we are undergoing a natural corrective process, and that the market, reacting to the interest rate hikes, is gradually de-rating in terms of PE multiples. While the markets may have been over-exuberant last May (when mid and small caps were in full bloom), this is now getting naturally ironed out and prices are taking a breather while earnings catch up. A decline in trading volumes also indicates that retail participation today is far less than 12 months ago.

Taken in this light, the last 12 months have been a very healthy pause that will refresh. It also questions the view of the bears who are constantly worried about market excesses. If the majority of traded stocks are down, how can the market be over-exuberant? As to how long this consolidation phase goes on is unclear, but at some stage the de-rating process will stop.

The negative view is that we are seeing the last stage of the market rally, wherein the breadth has narrowed dramatically and soon even the narrow indices and top 4-5 stocks will cave in and follow the broader market down. This camp points to the narrow breadth as a sign of weakness and not a reason to be less concerned on the market.

While I don't think this narrow breadth is a precursor to markets collapsing, I think this corrective phase will continue for some more time as investors need to figure out the impact on both earnings and growth of a tighter monetary environment. The longer-term impact of the rupee is another variable investors need to deal with.

The huge pipeline of capital raisings is also a concern to my mind. We should expect to see at least Rs 50,000 crore of equity fund raising in the next 6-9 months; yet no one seems to be worried. The average investor has not made money in the past 12 months, most funds have underperformed and FII flows into the country are weak and significantly lower on a year-on-year basis, yet everyone is sure all issues will be subscribed. While it is true that the quality of paper coming to the market is good and should get subscribed, where will the money come from? Will this quantum of fund raising not put pressure on markets?

The Indian markets are not as overextended as commonly perceived, and, except for a small group of mega caps, are already in correction mode. My own sense is that this corrective phase will extend and broaden, aided in part by the largest equity issuance pipeline I have ever seen. The attempt over the last week is to try and broaden the market rally and get even the mid caps to participate, aided no doubt by investors of all hues recognising the narrow breadth of the rise. Many investors are using strong global markets to try and force local investors to commit. While this may continue for some time it is unlikely to last.

A further period of consolidation awaits.

Additional Reading:

  • Why Optimists Say This Bull Has Legs - Wall Street Journal

Posted by toughiee at 12:01 AM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Final stages of a global bubble: Marc Faber

Source: DNA Money

Marc Faber, the investment guru who predicted the US stock market crash in 1987, says that the markets are in the “final stages of a bubble” and recommended investment in farm land and “assets that are depressed”

Faber, who oversees $300 million in assets at Marc Faber Ltd, told Bloomberg Television in an interview in Zurich: “I think we are in final stages of a bubble, but that final stage can be very steep as we noticed with the Nasdaq in 99 and early 2000.”

The editor and publisher of Gloom Boom and Doom Report said, “unlike the previous investment manias, we actually have bubbles everywhere. We have bubbles in real estate, in equities, in bonds, in commodities, in art prices and totally useless collectibles. So, this bubble is huge and includes just about any asset in the world.”

Since the earlier bubbles were concentrated on a few sectors, when they burst only those sectors were affected.

“From 1921 to 1929, the bubble was concentrated in US equities, and in the 19th century, in canal shares or in rail-road shares or banking shares. In the 70s, it was in gold and silver, in the 80s it was Japanese and Taiwanese shares, in the 90s, it was in one sector TMT (technology media telecommunications). Now there is a bubble everywhere,” he said.

“Now, if all the bubbles burst, you can imagine what will happen to the global economy. And for sure, it will end up very badly. But it’s tough to put a finger and say that it is going to happen tomorrow or in three months or in six months,” he said.

Click here for the full story.

Labels: Bear, Marc Faber

Posted by toughiee at 7:08 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Monday, May 21, 2007

Futile search for an Investment Formula

In a classic “Margin of Safety”, the author, Seth A. Klarman, writes about the futile search by investors for a winning formula in the stock market.

“Many investors greedily persist in the investment world’s version of a search for the hold grail: the attempt to find a successful investment formula. It is human nature to seek simple solutions to problems, however complex. Given the complexities of the investment process, it is perhaps natural for people to feel that only a formula could lead to investment success.

Just as many generals persist in fighting the last war, most investment formulas project the recent past into the future. Some investment formulas involve technical analysis, in which past stock-price movements are considered predictive of future prices. Other formulas incorporate investment fundamentals such as price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios, price-to-book-value ratios, sales or profits growth rates, dividend yields, and the prevailing level of interest rates. Despite the enormous effort that has been put into devising such formulas, none has been proven to work.

One simplistic, backward-looking formula employed by some investors is to buy stocks with low P/E ratios. The idea is that by paying a low multiple of earnings, an investor is buying an out-of-favor bargain. In reality investors who follow such a formula are essentially driving by looking only in the rear-view mirror. Stocks with a low P/E ratio are often depressed because the market price has already discounted the prospect of a sharp fall in earnings. Investors who buy such stocks may soon find that the P/E ratio has risen because earnings have declined.

Another type of formula used by many investors involves projecting their most recent personal experiences into the future. As a result, many investors have entered’ the 1990s having “learned” a number of wrong and potentially dangerous lessons from the ebullient 1980s market performance; some have come to regard the 1987 stock market crash as nothing more than an aberration and nothing less than a great buying opportunity. The quick recovery after the October 1989 stock market shakeout and 1990 junk-bond market collapse provide reinforcement of this shortsighted lesson. Many investors, like Pavlov’s dog, will foolishly look to the next market selloff, regardless of its proximate cause, as another buying “opportunity”.

The financial markets are far too complex to be incorporated into a formula. Moreover, if any successful investment formula could be devised, it would be exploited by those who possessed it until competition eliminated the excess profits. The quest for a formula that worked would then begin anew. Investors would be much better off to redirect the time and effort committed to devising formulas into fundamental analysis of specific investment opportunities.”

Posted by toughiee at 10:46 AM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Real Estate Bubble Or Bubbly

Despite a correction, real estate investing will provide returns and investors need to have a dynamic strategy as the market matures

The real estate sector has been featuring on the Reserve Bank of India’s radar for a long time. The central bank has been concerned about inordinately high prices of properties, both commercial and residential and has been issuing diktats aimed at easing them.

Rising interest rates, increasing risk weights for banks lending to real estate and now the clamp down on real estate companies borrowing abroad, all these measures suggest that the real estate price climb will be arrested. Reports of a price ease are doing the rounds, especially in metro suburbs.

Does it mean that the gains from real estate investing would disappear and that investors with extensive exposure to property should wait for another surge to happen? Or is it just a simple correction, witnessed in most upward moving markets, a small recess before the next surge?

Click here for the full story.

Posted by toughiee at 11:59 AM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

The joy of predictability

Rising interest rates and uncertain stock markets have sent investors rushing towards safe and predictable fixed-income investments

by Dhirendra Kumar - FE

It is good when one does not have to deal with an unpredictable future. We love finding out what is going to happen. This is good business for those who pretend to predict the future. Of course, the desire to predict often outstrips actual ability, as anyone who has been following the media coverage of the UP elections knows. Perhaps elections in a complex multi-party first-past-the-post system are not inherently predictable. Apparently, the best strategy is to make many predictions and then hope that at least a few of them are not completely off target. Much like the business of predicting the stock markets, in fact.

Click here for the full story.

Posted by toughiee at 11:55 AM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

How broadcasters script the growth story

The spate of channel launches spells entertaining times for TV surfers. But can the sector accommodate another 100 channels, in addition to the 200-plus now? About 70 proposals for channel launches await Government approval for uplinking from India, the majority targeting the news genre. Industry players maintain there is room for many more channels and that a lot of formats remain unexplored by today's networks.

However, they also admit that advertisers continue to have tremendous bargaining power as channel launches mean greater fragmentation of viewership. That's a cause for concern, considering that advertisements are the main driver of revenues and will remain so for the next couple of years.

Here is a look at why broadcasters are bullish and what impact the channel rush could have on profitability.

Click here for the full story.

Posted by toughiee at 11:52 AM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Reason behind the asset bubble

M3 growth in a year should normally be equal to nominal GDP, but the numbers show it has been way above, especially in the last two years

by Manas - HT Mint

Not only has money supply (M3) been rising in recent years, but it has also gone up sharply as a proportion of nominal gross domestic product (GDP). Here’s the data: The annual increase in M3 as a proportion of GDP in that year was 9.1% in FY02; 9.0% in FY03; 11.1% in FY04; 10.1% in FY05; 12.4% in FY06 and as much as 15.7% last fiscal. M3 growth in a year should normally be at least equal to the increase in goods and services plus the rise in the prices of these goods and services, which is nothing, but nominal GDP. But as the numbers show, M3 growth has been well above the growth in nominal GDP, especially in the last two years.

The increase in money supply has been boosting asset prices

What does this trend indicate? Says Ajit Ranade, chief economist of the Aditya Birla Group: “Part of it is the result of financial deepening, as the use of money becomes more and more widespread.” But the extra liquidity could also be spilling over into higher asset prices. The rise in goods and services is captured by nominal GDP, but the rise in asset prices is not.

Gaurav Kapur, senior economist with ABN Amro Bank, says that rapid M3 growth is a reflection of the sharp rise in bank credit. “Bank credit as a proportion of nominal GDP too has gone up,” he says, ”partly because banks have discovered retail lending.” Kapur also agrees that part of the M3 increase, beyond that required for the real economy, has been boosting asset prices.

This fiscal, the Reserve Bank of India wants M3 growth to decelerate to 17-17.5%, while real GDP growth is pegged at 8.5% and inflation at 5%, giving a nominal GDP growth rate of 13.5%. That will mean the M3/nominal GDP ratio will be 13.8% in FY08, well below last fiscal’s 15.7%.

Posted by toughiee at 11:09 AM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Sell in May, return in Oct works, but ...

... in India, the re-entry has to be different

by Sanat Vallikappen - DNA Money

Timing the market, as we all know, is a futile exercise, but a few key takes from a recent Citigroup report may help you strategise on your May move and subsequent plans to optimise your returns.

Markus Rosgen, Elaine Chu and Chris W Leung of Citigroup, on Friday (report) last, advised that if one were to sell towards the end of May, then stay away at least for four months -that is, till the end of September - before returning to the markets. Or endorse the market truism “Sell in May and go away”. While that may well be true elsewhere, Indian investors may be advised to look through some other numbers churned below.

Back to the Citi trio: The Asian region’s (excluding Japan) four-month performance has been the worst between May and September, at -2.9% per year on average from 1990. “Had an investor followed this strategy religiously from 1990 (of selling in May and coming back only by the end of September), the strategy would have yielded a compounded annual growth rate of 11.2%,” said the report. This is against a compounded annual growth rate of 7.1% for a long-only (remaining invested throughout) strategy. “The time to re-introduce risk to an Asian portfolio is in September,” Rosgen, Chu and Leung said, because the four months from September end to January end are historically the best for Asian markets.

“The historic return over the next four months has been 10.2%, the single best four-month return profile available in Asia (ex-Japan),” said the report. The caveat, however, is that this strategy has not worked since 2003, and one wonders about its implications for the current year.

But for someone investing in India, none of this may hold true.

Because data processed from 1992 by Citibank reveals that India has returned an average 7.7% from the end of May to the end of September. Historically, according to the Citigroup report, the worst four months for India have been from the end of February to the end of June, when it has given negative returns of 2.8%. V K Sharma, director and head of research at Anagram Securities, said: “If you are not participating in Indian equity over July and August, then you are missing out on the second and third best months of the year.”

Anagram data said over the last 17 years (from 1990), the Indian markets have given an average return of 3.47% in July and 4.5% in August. Taking returns over a four-month period, the Ahmedabad-based broking house said the June-July-August-September period are the best for Indian equity, followed by November-December-January-February.

“The worst months are March, April, May and October,” adds Sharma. Returning to the original thesis, Citi recommends a sell on banks, other financials, telecoms, consumers and industrials — for those who wish to sell in May and go away.

Posted by toughiee at 9:42 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Sunday, May 06, 2007

The Reality of Realty

In the past three months, residential property prices in Whitefield, a plum location in Bangalore until recently, have dipped 10-20 per cent. “Prices could go down further to 30 per cent,” says Santosh Martin, CEO of DivyaSree Developers. In fact, a few weeks ago, a developer of residential apartments in Bangalore stated that he got no response to an advertisement for an upcoming project. Furthermore, when he went to bankers to tie-up retail home loan funding for his prospective customers, just one public sector bank was willing to fund 65 per cent of the flat cost. This as opposed to 85 per cent till a year ago!

Prices are dipping selectively in other cities as well; the offtake is slowing down. The National Capital Region (NCR), which saw 150-200 per cent appreciation in the past three years, is sluggish. “There is a clear slowdown in the past 45 days as people are deferring purchases of homes,” says Sunil Gupta, managing director, Omaxe Housing. “This should have a cool-off effect on the high levels of speculative investment activity in the real estate markets and should help in stabilising prices in the short to medium term,” says Vincent Lottifier, country head-India, Jones Lang La Salle.

There is an oversupply of commercial space in many pockets of the tier-I cities, which, in turn, impacts other segments. However, the trigger was pulled when the government decided to tighten money supply in the market by introducing a series of fiscal reforms, including retail interest rates.

Click here for the full story.

Posted by toughiee at 6:33 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

It pays to invest in reading

by PV Subramanyam - MoneyControl.com

Being a good investor is hard work. And, you can't be one without reading -- a lot. Buying stocks that outperform the market is an immensely competitive task. And not being armed with insight from investment literature is a serious handicap. I have compiled some investment reading that could help you stay way ahead of the pack, when it comes to investing. I can personally vouch for this literature, though some of it includes recommendations by friends. Let me start with a personal experience. A big portfolio management company asked me if I would help set up their library.

I said, “Yes, provided you give me four or five of your employees who will ‘own’ the book. They should know the book, have read it, understood it, and be able to make a presentation on the book.”

Click here for the full story

Posted by toughiee at 7:04 PM | Permalink | Comments | links to this post

Search


Compilations

  • Warren Buffett
  • Charlie Munger
  • Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

Last posts

  • Site Moved!
  • The real reason why oil prices are rising
  • New Blog!
  • How to think like J.P. Morgan?
  • They're wrong about oil
  • Investment Nuggets by Benjamin Graham
  • ‘Returns dip as motion rises’
  • Hunt for The Bottom!
  • What happened to India story?
  • Who should you trust your money with?

Archives

  • November 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008

About This Blog

  • Get on Mobile
  • Atom Feeds
  • Disclaimer
  • Email to Owner

Blog Directories

  • Stockblogs

Related Blogs

  • DeepWealth
  • Dardashti
  • Ridgewood Group
  • Trading Day by Day

Business Papers

  • Economic Times
  • Business Standard
  • Business Line
  • Financial Express
  • DNA Money

Business News

  • Capital Market
  • Equitymaster
  • India Infoline
  • Moneycontrol.com
  • Yahoo! India Finance
  • ICICIdirect

Results

  • India Earnings

Quotes & Stats

  • Asian Indices
  • All Indian Quotes
  • Indian ADRs
  • Indian GDRs
  • Arbitrage
  • Sector Classification
  • FII Trends
  • MF Trends
  • NSE Heat Map
  • Insider Trading
  • BC/RD
  • BM (Company)
  • BM (Date)
  • BSE Bulk Deals
  • NSE Bulk Deals
  • NSE Block Deals
  • US Indices
  • US Pre-Market
  • US After Hours
  • CBOE VIX
  • European Indices
  • Commodity/Currency
  • Nymex Light Crude Oil
  • Nymex Natural Gas
  • Nymex Gold
  • Nymex Silver
  • Nymex Copper
  • All In One

Equity Analysis

  • Kotak Street
  • Moneypore
  • Geojit
  • IDBI
  • Naviamarkets
  • ET Big Bucks
  • BS Smart Investor
  • FE Investor
  • BL Investment World

Screeners

  • Equitymaster
  • ICICIdirect

Research Reports

  • Moneycontrol

Technical Analysis

  • ICICIdirect
  • Yahoo! Finance

E-Books

  • Value Investing
  • Trading & Technicals
  • Gann
  • Elliott Wave
  • Risk Management
  • Derivatives

Misc. Links

  • BSE
  • NSE
  • SEBI
  • SEBI Edifar
  • Corp. Filings
  • WatchOutInvestors

Global Research

  • Morgan Stanley GEF
  • Hussman Funds

Interactive

  • Online Chat
Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]
Powered by Blogger