Capital goods: Look before you leap!
However, do these statistics and growth prospects definitely mean that investors should be blindfolded in their approach to investing in stocks from the sector? Not really!
While we have a positive view on the sector in terms of improving revenue visibility on the back of burgeoning order books of players across the sector, which is a consequence of the huge investment plans from public and private sector enterprises, there are a host of risks that surround these companies' prospects.
Over the past few years, considering the huge opportunity that the sector brings along, there has been a multi-layer increase in the number of participants in the capital goods and heavy engineering sector - multi-layer because the increase has been seen across the spectrum pf projects and heavy equipment segments. This has led to an increase in 'commoditisation' of the industry, whereby companies are fighting for volumes by sacrificing profitability. Even the best and most diverse of the companies have not been able to perk up their margins significantly in the past two years. While higher input prices are definitely a reason for lacklustre margin profile of many of these companies, there is no denying the fact that commoditisation has taken a serious toll across sub-segments, be it infrastructure creation, or power.
Another negative offshoot of the business opportunity has been increasing challenges for companies on the employee acquisition and retention front. Some of the companies have even indicated of attrition levels of 10% to 15%, which, unless clarified, might seem like employee churn in the IT services and BPO industry. Some critical divisions of these companies, like design and project execution, are in fact facing the biggest crunch in terms of talent acquisition and retention. And, apart from rise in employee costs, this has led to a big part of the crucial management time getting diverted to human resource issues.
Finally, as a flip side to the 'high visibility' factor in terms of burgeoning order books, there emerge equally high levels of high execution risks. This is because companies from the sector are increasingly adding contracts that have long gestation periods, or long execution cycles. Among many, this leads to risks from changes in business climate and uncertain movement of commodity prices.
And, what about valuations? Well, this is one of the foremost concerns that we have with the capital goods/heavy engineering stocks. With some of the leading companies trading at price to earnings multiple of as high as 40 times trailing twelve months' earnings, despite factoring in all kinds of positives like visibility and improved execution capabilities, we are uncomfortable with respect to the overall sector valuations.
As indicated above, apart from the 'visibility' part (as seen from big order bookings), investors need to clearly understand the risks associated with the same. While the need to sustain high levels of growth through creation of world-class infrastructure facilities shall continue to provide companies from the sector with multiple growth options, you, as an investor, need to identify whether the price that needs to be paid for the ensuing growth is justifiable or not.
- Operators are the real people who are moving the markets.
- When you combine ignorance with leverage you get some pretty interesting results. - Warren Buffet